Assignment: Data and Tracers
Assignment: Data and Tracers
Evaluation
a) Plan: What is your plan for evaluation of the strategies using performance improvement data and tracers? What tracers will you use? Include necessary detail to deliver key points and requirements, such as specific data collection methods, timeframes for evaluation, and intended re- evaluation.
b) Plan Evaluation: How effective and sustainable is your plan? In other words, evaluate the effectiveness and the ease of use, timeliness, and efficiency of your plan for the progress and success of your initiative.
c) Role of Leadership: Given your discussions about the roles and responsibilities of leadership within the organization, discuss the importance of leadership for successful improvement initiatives. In other words, articulate the role and importance of leadership in the successful review, implementation, and continuous improvement of performance initiatives.
Milestones
Milestone One: Introduction This milestone is due in Module Two. This milestone is graded with the Milestone One Rubric. Milestone Two: Research and Support This milestone is due in Module Four. This milestone is graded with the Milestone Two Rubric. Milestone Three: Implementation This milestone is due in Module Five. This milestone is graded with the Milestone Three Rubric. Milestone Four: Evaluation This milestone is due in Module Six. This milestone is graded with the Milestone Four Rubric. Final Project: Submission The final project is due in Module Seven. This final project is graded with the Final Project Rubric.
Final Project Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Your presentation should be approximately 15–20 slides, not including reference slides and introductory slides. You should include appropriate speaker notes, and you may include an audiovisual recording of your presentation in your submission.
Critical Elements Exemplary (100%) Proficient (85%) Needs Improvement (55%) Not Evident (0%) Value
Introduction: Organization [NUR-400-03]
Meets “Proficient” criteria and evidences keen insight into analyzing organizational nuances that could influence quality planning
Analyzes accurately the organization to determine important characteristics for consideration in planning for change and implementation
Analyzes the organization to determine important characteristics for consideration in planning for change and implementation, but with gaps in accuracy or detail
Does not analyze the organization to determine important characteristics for consideration in planning for change and implementation
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.
