Assignment: Information for All Stakeholders
Assignment: Information for All Stakeholders
Permalink:
Assignment: Describes the Reasons for the Referral and Relevant Background Information for All Stakeholders
Total: 1.00
Distinguished – Comprehensively describes the background details for the referral, including pertinent information about the assessments recommended for the scenario.
Proficient – Describes the background details for the referral, including pertinent information about the assessments recommended for the scenario. Minor details are missing or inappropriate/inaccurate for the scenario.
Basic – Minimally describes the background details for the referral, including pertinent information about the assessments recommended for the scenario. Relevant details are missing and/or inappropriate/inaccurate for the scenario.
Below Expectations – Attempts to describe the background details for the referral, including pertinent information about the assessments recommended for the scenario; however, significant details are missing and inappropriate/inaccurate for the scenario.
Non-Performance – The description of the reasons for the referral and background information are either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Includes a Bulleted List of the Test(s) and Other Assessment Measure(s) Recommended for the Evaluation of the Given Scenario
Total: 1.00
Distinguished – Includes a complete bulleted list of the test(s) and other assessment measure(s) recommended for the evaluation of the given scenario.
Proficient – Includes a bulleted list of the test(s) and other assessment measure(s) recommended for the evaluation of the given scenario. Some minor details are missing.
Basic – Includes a limited bulleted list of the test(s) and other assessment measure(s) recommended for the evaluation of the given scenario. Relevant details are missing and/or inaccurate.
Below Expectations – Attempts to includes a bulleted list of the test(s) and other assessment measure(s) recommended for the evaluation of the given scenario; however, significant details are missing and inaccurate.
Non-Performance – A bulleted list of the test(s) and other assessment measure(s) recommended for the evaluation of the given scenario is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Includes a Narrative Description of the Assessments
Total: 1.00
Distinguished -Includes a thorough narrative description of the assessments.
Proficient – Includes a narrative description of the assessments. Some minor details are missing.
Basic -Includes a limited narrative description of the assessments. Relevant details are missing and/or inaccurate.
Below Expectations – Attempts to includes a narrative description of the assessments; however, significant elements are missing and inaccurate.
Non-Performance – A narrative description of the assessments is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Examines and Comments on the Major Theoretical Approaches, Research Methods, and Assessment Instruments Appropriate for the Situation and Stakeholder Needs
Total: 1.50
Distinguished – Provides and exceptionally detailed explanation of the assessment instruments selected for this scenario which is appropriate for the situation and stakeholder needs based on the literature in the field.
Proficient – Provides a mostly detailed explanation of the assessment instruments selected for this scenario which is appropriate for the situation and stakeholder needs based on the literature in the field. The examination of the literature is slightly underdeveloped.
Basic – Provides a limited explanation of the assessment instruments selected for this scenario, and which may not be appropriate for the situation and stakeholder needs based on the literature in the field. The examination is underdeveloped.
Below Expectations – Attempts to provide an explanation of the assessment instruments selected for this scenario based on the literature in the field; however, the selected assessments are not appropriate for the situation and stakeholder needs, and the examination is significantly underdeveloped.
Non-Performance – The examination of the theoretical approaches for this scenario is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Evaluates Current Research in the Field of Personality Theories and Provides Examples of How these Assessments are Valid for Use in the Chosen Scenario
Total: 1.50
Distinguished – Comprehensively evaluates current research in the field of personality theories and provides relevant examples of how these assessments are valid for use in the chosen scenario.
Proficient – Evaluates current research in the field of personality theories and provides mostly relevant examples of how these assessments are valid for use in the chosen scenario. Minor details are missing.
Basic – Minimally valuates current research in the field of personality theories and provides somewhat relevant examples of how these assessments are valid for use in the chosen scenario. Relevant details are missing and/or inaccurate.
Below Expectations -Attempts to evaluate current research in the field of personality theories and provides examples of how these assessments are valid for use in the chosen scenario; however, the examples are not relevant and significant details are missing or inaccurate.
Non-Performance – An evaluation of current research in the field of personality theories and provides examples of how these assessments are valid for use in the chosen scenario is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
