Assignment: Modifying Unwarranted Variations
Assignment: Modifying Unwarranted Variations
Treatment; American Thoracic Society; American Association for Critical Care Nurses; American College of Chest Physicians; European Society for Intensive Care Medicine; Society of Critical Care. An Official ATS/AACN/ACCP/ESICM/SCCM policy statement: responding to requests for potentially inappropriate treatments in intensive care units. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015;191: 1318–1330.
15. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.
16. Loewy EH, Loewy RS. Textbook of healthcare ethics, 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2004.
17. Lo B. Resolving ethical dilemmas, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000.
18. Thompson DR, Kaufman D, editors. Critical care ethics: a practice guide, 3rd ed. Mount Prospect, IL: Society of Critical Care Medicine; 2014.
19. Curtis JR, Burt RA. Point: the ethics of unilateral “do not resuscitate” orders: the role of “informed assent”. Chest 2007;132:748–751.
20. Kon AA. Informed nondissent rather than informed assent. Chest 2008; 133:320–321.
21. Kon AA. The “window of opportunity:” helping parents make the most difficult decision they will ever face using an informed non-dissent model. Am J Bioeth 2009;9:55–56.
22. Kon AA. The shared decision-making continuum. JAMA 2010;304: 903–904.
23. Kon AA. Informed non-dissent: a better option than slow codes when families cannot bear to say “let her die.” Am J Bioeth 2011;11:22–23.
24. Curtis JR. The use of informed assent in withholding cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the ICU. Virtual Mentor 2012;14:545–550.
Copyright © 2016 by the American Thoracic Society
1336 American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine Volume 193 Number 12 | June 15 2016
EDITORIALS
. Kon AA, Davidson JE, Morrison W, Danis M, White DB; American College of Critical Care Medicine; American Thoracic Society. Shared decision making in ICUs: an American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society policy statement. Crit Care Med 2016;44:188–201.
7. O’Connor AM, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Flood AB. Modifying unwarranted variations in health care: shared decision making using patient decision aids. Health Aff (Millwood) 2004;Suppl Variation: VAR63-72.
8. O’Connor AM, Wennberg JE, Legare F, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Moulton BW, Sepucha KR, Sodano AG, King JS. Toward the ‘tipping point’: decision aids and informed patient choice. Health Aff (Millwood) 2007; 26:716–725.
9. Charles C, Whelan T, Gafni A. What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment? BMJ 1999;319:780–782.
10. Heyland DK, Cook DJ, Rocker GM, Dodek PM, Kutsogiannis DJ, Peters S, Tranmer JE, O’Callaghan CJ. Decision-making in the ICU: perspectives of the substitute decision-maker. Intensive Care Med 2003;29:75–82.
11. Anderson WG, Arnold RM, Angus DC, Bryce CL. Passive decision- making preference is associated with anxiety and depression in relatives of patients in the intensive care unit. J Crit Care 2009;24: 249–254.
12. Johnson SK, Bautista CA, Hong SY, Weissfeld L, White DB. An empirical study of surrogates’ preferred level of control over value- laden life support decisions in intensive care units. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;183:915–921.
13. Madrigal VN, Carroll KW, Hexem KR, Faerber JA, Morrison WE, Feudtner C. Parental decision-making preferences in the pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2012;40:2876–2882.
14. Bosslet GT, Pope TM, Rubenfeld GD, Lo B, Truog RD, Rushton CH, Curtis JR, Ford DW, Osborne M, Misak C, et al.; American Thoracic Society ad hoc Committee on Futile and Potentially Inappropriate
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.
