Assignment: Professional Insight
Assignment: Professional Insight
Implementation: Flow of Data [NUR-400-03]
Meets “Proficient” criteria and offers keen insight into organizational processes that enhance the flow of performance improvement data
Accurately articulates how organizational processes allow for flow of survey-required data that is necessary for the performance improvement initiative
Articulates how organizational processes allow for survey- required data, but with gaps in detail or accuracy
Does not articulate how organizational processes allow for survey-required data
5.28
Implementation: Needed Leadership
[NUR-400-05]
Meets “Proficient” criteria and offers professional insight into leadership roles that are needed for successful implementation of the initiative
Accurately describes the roles and behaviors of leadership within the organization that serve to ensure successful implementation of the initiative
Describes the roles and behaviors of leadership within the organization that serve to ensure successful implementation of the initiative, but with gaps in accuracy
Does not describe the roles and behaviors of leadership within the organization that serve to ensure successful implementation of the initiative
5.28
Evaluation: Plan
[NUR-400-01]
Meets “Proficient” criteria and offers insightful detail concerning the data collection methods and processes for re- evaluation of the initiative
Accurately articulates the strategies for evaluation of the initiative by specifying data collection methods, time frames, and processes for re-evaluation
Articulates the strategies for evaluation of the initiative by specifying data collection methods and time frames, but with gaps in accuracy or detail
Does not articulate the strategies for evaluation of the initiative by specifying data collection methods and time frames
5.28
Evaluation: Plan Evaluation [NUR-400-01]
Meets “Proficient” criteria and offers keen insight into the processes that affect timeliness and sustainability of the plan
Logically evaluates the plan for its effectiveness, ease of use, and efficiency within the context of initiative progress and success
Evaluates the plan for its effectiveness, ease of use, and efficiency, but with gaps in detail or logic, or not within the context of initiative progress and success
Does not evaluate the plan for its effectiveness, ease of use, and efficiency
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.
