NR 602 Week 2 – Presentation: Osgood Schlatter Disease

Want create site? With you can do it easy.

NR 602 Week 2 – Presentation: Osgood Schlatter Disease

Presentation: Osgood Schlatter Disease

The purpose of this assignment is to enhance the student’s clinical reasoning, confidence and learning of various pediatric and women health topics through facilitated discussion.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NR 602 Week 2 – Presentation: Osgood Schlatter Disease
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

In Weeks 2 and 6, you will create a Grand Rounds presentation on the topic assigned to you by the faculty member.

1. Describe the most commonly prescribed drugs use in primary care for the chose condition.

2. Utilize clinical guidelines, research articles or other materials to support your findings.

3. Identify any practice barriers, issues, or problems (including cultural diversity and healthcare literacy).

4. Discuss best practices for optimal outcomes.

Due Dates:Pediatric Grand Rounds due Week 2 (please see specific days/times below)

Keep in mind the following guidelines and grading criteria while taking part in this assignment:

The Grand Rounds presentation will consist of a patient scenario that is assigned to you by your faculty in week one. The presentation is a video recording in Kaltura. Recording of the presentation should be interesting, professional, and focused to the topic. Wear your lab coat and name tag/badge during the recording.You must use a visual aid during your presentation.

By Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT – In addition to submitting your presentation, you will also need to lead a discussion on your topic in the discussion thread. The initial post and Kaltura presentation are both due by Wednesday 11:59 p.m. MT. NOTE: By Wednesday, you will also initiate a discussion to lead.

Discussion Lead Requirement: Develop three (3) questions on your topic you can ask to initiate the discussion and keep it going.

By Friday, 11:59 p.m. MT, respond substantively to a minimal of two (2) peers’ presentation questions**If all students have a response, then choose the student with the least responses to their posting.

By Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT, summarize your grand rounds presentation by posting a summary reply to your initial post in the discussion thread. Summarize the discussion as well as conclusions from the collective group discussion. Include evidence based references at the bottom of the summary ANDrespond to ALL faculty questions regarding your presentation.

Presentation: Osgood Schlatter Disease Criterion

Exceptional

Outstanding or highest level of performance

Exceeds

Very good or high level of performance

Meets

Satisfactory level of performance

Needs Improvement

Poor or failing level of performance

Developing

Unsatisfactory level of performance

Content

Possible Points = 150

Introduction

20 Points

15 Points

10 Points

8 Points

0 Points

Introduction of chosen grand rounds topic that include a detailed review of pathophysiology, epidemiology, and risk factors.

Introduction of chosen grand rounds topic, but omits one of the following criteria: pathophysiology, epidemiology or risk factors.

Introduction of chosen grand rounds topic but omits two of the following criteria: pathophysiology, epidemiology or risk factors

OR

Provides vague description of 1-2 of the following criteria of pathophysiology, epidemiology or risk factors.

Introduction of chosen grand rounds topic but omits all three of the following criteria: pathophysiology, epidemiology or risk factors

OR

Provides vague description of all three (2) criteria of pathophysiology, epidemiology or risk factors.

Does not present an Introduction of chosen grand rounds topic.

Clinical Assessment

10 Points

8 Points

6 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Discussion in detail 4 typical clinical assessment findings for chosen topic.

Discussion in detail of 3 typical clinical findings.

Discussion in detail of 2 typical clinical findings

Discussion of one (1) clinical assessment finding

OR

List of clinical assessment findings instead of a discussion.

Does not describe any clinical assessment findings.

Differential Diagnoses

20 Points

15 Points

10 Points

8 Points

0 Points

List AND discuss in detail a minimal of three (3) differential diagnoses with scholarly support from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources.

List AND discuss in detail two (2) differential diagnoses with scholarly support from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources.

List three differential diagnosesbut does not include a discussionwith scholarly support from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources

List two or less differential diagnosesbut does not include a discussionwith scholarly support from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources

Does not list and discuss differential diagnoses.

Diagnostic Studies/Labs

10 Points

8 Points

6 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Discuss diagnostic studies and labs that can be used to confirm diagnosis and rationale and scholarly support from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources.

Discuss diagnostic studies and labs that can be used to confirm diagnosis with rationale, but omits scholarly support from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources.

Discuss diagnostic studies and labs that can be used to confirm diagnosis with scholarly support but omits rationale.

Vague discussion of of diagnostic studies and labs used to confirm diagnosis, omits both the rationales AND scholarly support from clinical. guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources.Presentation: Osgood Schlatter Disease

Does not discuss diagnostic studies/labs.

Prevention and Treatment Options

10 Points

8 Points

6 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Discuss prevention AND treatment options including first line medication and non-pharmacological options.

Discuss prevention AND treatment options including first line medication, does not include non-pharmacological option(s).

Discuss treatment options but does not include one of the following: first line medication, non-pharmacological option(s) or prevention.

Discuss treatment options but does not include two or more of the following: first line medication, non-pharmacological option(s) or prevention.

Does not discuss prevention and treatment options.

Education

10 Points

8 Points

6 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Discusses in detail patient AND family education for chosen grand rounds topic with rationales.

Provides a general discussion of patient and family education with rationales.Presentation: Osgood Schlatter Disease

Lists patient and family education instead of a discussion with rationales.

Lists patient OR education instead of a discussion without inclusion of rationales.

OR

Information discussed is vague or unclear.

Does not discuss patient and family education.

Identify Outcomes

10 Points

8 Points

6 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Describe optimal outcomes after treatment with suggested medication, including expected follow up care.

Describe optimal outcomes after treatment with suggested medication. Omits expected follow up care.

Incorrectly identifies optimal outcomes after treatment. Includes expected follow up care.

Incorrectly identifies optimal outcomes after treatment with suggested medication AND omits expected follow up care.

Does not address outcomes.Presentation: Osgood Schlatter Disease

Lead Discussion

10 Points

8 Points

6 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Fully, facilitate discussion relevant to the presentation topic by incorporating three (3) open discussion questions for peers. Questions posed allow students to apply additional concepts or explore additional information relevant to the topic.Presentation: Osgood Schlatter Disease

Facilitate discussion relevant to the presentation topic by incorporating at least two (2) discussion questions for peers. Questions posed allow students to apply additional concepts or explore additional information relevant to the topic.Presentation: Osgood Schlatter Disease

Attempt to facilitate discussion relevant to the presentation topic by incorporating at least one (1) discussion questions for peers. Question posed allow students to apply additional concepts or explore additional information relevant to the topic.

Attempt to facilitate discussion relevant to the presentation topic with two to three (2-3) questions BUT questions posed does not allow students to apply additional concepts or explore additional information relevant to the topic.

Does not lead discussion.

Interactive Dialogue with Student Peers

10 Points

8 Points

6 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Student responds substantively with additional insight to at least two different peer presentations by Friday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Student responds to at least two different peer presentations by Friday 11:59 p.m. MT but response is not substantively OR does not add additional insight

Student responds substantively with additional insight to at least one different peer presentations by Friday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Student responds to at least one different peer presentations by Friday 11:59 p.m. MT but response is not substantively OR does not add additional insight

Student does not participate in interactive dialogue

Summary Requirement

10 Points

8 Points

6 Points

4 Points

0 Points

By Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT, adds summary post to the original grand rounds presentation that summarizes the discussion. Includes conclusions from thecollective group discussion on the topic.

By Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT, adds summary post to the original grand rounds presentation with conclusions from the collective group discussion on the topic but information presented is not clear or difficult to follow.

By Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT, adds a summary to the original grand rounds presentation but omits conclusions from the collective group discussion on the topic.

By Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT, adds a summary BUT does not summarizes the initial discussion ANDomits conclusions from the collective group discussion on the topic

Student does not post a summary.Presentation: Osgood Schlatter Disease

Evidence Based Research

10 Points

8 Points

6 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Includes six (6) evidence based Peer Reviewed journal articles (within last 5 years) from Chamberlain Online Library and/or practice guidelines from reputable source(s)for the presentation itself (not including support for peer responses).

Includes five (5) evidence based Peer Reviewed articles current (within last 5 years) from Chamberlain Online Library and/or practice guideline from reputable source(s)for the presentation itself (not including support for peer responses).

Include four (4) evidence based Peer Reviewed articles current (within last 5 years) from Chamberlain Online Library and/or practice guideline from reputable source(s)for the presentation itself (not including support for peer responses).

Includes two to three (2 – 3) evidence based Peer Reviewed articles current (within last 5 years) from Chamberlain Online Library and/or practice guideline from reputable source(s)for the presentation itself (not including support for peer responses).

OR

Two or more articles are older than 7 years

Does not includeevidence based Peer Reviewed articles current (within last 5 years) from Chamberlain Online Library and/or practice guideline from reputable source(s)for the presentation itself (not including support for peer responses).

Interactive Dialogue with Faculty

10 Points

8 Points

6 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Student responds substantively with additional insight to all faculty directed questions. This includes question(s) to the individual student and any questions posed to the class as a whole by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Student responds substantively to at least one faculty directed questions by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Student responds to two or more faculty directed questions, but post is not substantively by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Student responds to only one faculty directed questions, but post is not substantively by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Student does not participate in interactive dialogue with faculty.

Presentation Development

10 Points

8 Points

6 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Overall presentation is clear, concise, and organized; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; recorded in Kaltura.Lab coat and name badge present. Visual aid is present during presentation.

Overall presentation is clear, concise but missing one (1) of the following: organized, demonstration of ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources, recorded in Kaltura, no lab coat, name badge not present, or visual aid is not used.

Overall presentation is clear, concise but missing two (2) of the following: organized, demonstration of ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources, recorded in Kaltura, no lab coat ,no name badge present, or visual aid is not used.

Overall presentation is clear, concise but missing three (3) of the following: organized, demonstration of ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources, recorded in Kaltura, no lab coat ,no name badge present, or visual aid is not used.

Overall presentation is not clear OR missing four or more of the following: organized, demonstration of ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources, recorded in Kaltura, no lab coat ,no name badge present, or visual aid is not used.

Deductions

5 pointDeduction for students who do not respond to peers by Friday 11:59pm MT

15 points(10%) deduction for presentations submitted after 11:59pm MT on Wednesday

Note: Students will not receive credit for work in the threads submitted after Sunday, 11:59pm MT

Total Points

of 150 points

Did you find apk for android? You can find new and apps.

Essaywriters4me

Calculate The Price Of Your Paper

Pages
{{total || ""}}

Why Choose Us

Top Quality and Well-Researched Papers

We always make sure that writers follow all your instructions precisely. You can choose your academic level: high school, college/university or professional, and we will assign a writer who has a respective degree.

Professional and Experienced Academic Writers

We have a team of professional writers with experience in academic and business writing. Many are native speakers and able to perform any task for which you need help.

Free Unlimited Revisions

If you think we missed something, send your order for a free revision. You have 10 days to submit the order for review after you have received the final document. You can do this yourself after logging into your personal account or by contacting our support.

Prompt Delivery and 100% Money-Back-Guarantee

All papers are always delivered on time. In case we need more time to master your paper, we may contact you regarding the deadline extension. In case you cannot provide us with more time, a 100% refund is guaranteed.

Original & Confidential

We use several writing tools checks to ensure that all documents you receive are free from plagiarism. Our editors carefully review all quotations in the text. We also promise maximum confidentiality in all of our services.

Customer Support 24/7

Our support agents are available 24 hours a day 7 days a week and committed to providing you with the best customer experience. Get in touch whenever you need any assistance.

Freebies
Our FREE services
Every order comes with these awesome features.
Order Now
Money Back Guarantee
FREE Best essay writer across your subject
FREE Cover page and bibliography
FREE APA/MLA/Chicago formatting
FREE Free Revisions
FREE 24/7 customer support hotline and chat

Essays

Essay Writing Services

No matter what kind of academic paper you need and how urgent you need it, you are welcome to choose your academic level and the type of your paper at an affordable price. We take care of all your paper needs and give a 24/7 customer care support system.

Admissions

Admission and Business Papers

An admission essay is an essay or other written statement by a candidate, often a potential student enrolling in a college, university, or graduate school. You can be rest assurred that through our service we will write the best admission essay for you.

Editing

Editing and Proofreading

Our academic writers and editors make the necessary changes to your paper so that it is polished. We also format your document by correctly quoting the sources and creating reference lists in the formats APA, Harvard, MLA, Chicago / Turabian.

Coursework

Revision Support

If you think your paper could be improved, you can request a review. In this case, your paper will be checked by the writer or assigned to an editor. You can use this option as many times as you see fit. This is free because we want you to be completely satisfied with the service offered.