Overview of the Process
Due: Jan 20
|STEP TWO: Literature Review
Due: Feb 15
Hypotheses Data, and Methods
Due: March 8
Data Analysis and Results
Due: April 14
Discussion and Conclusion/
|Final Draft Due
At Final Assessment
In this course one of the primary activities will be the production of an empirical research paper based on a research question, several hypotheses, a statistical analysis of the hypotheses, and a summary of the findings. You will construct the paper in stages, and you will receive feedback throughout the process. The following list outlines, step-by-step, the process you will follow. I will provide instructions throughout the semester with further detail on each step of the process.
For those students who were enrolled in Professor Barringer’s Logic of Inquiry course in Spring 2019, you may have already formulated your research question and have identified the dataset that you will be using. You are in good shape.
For those who have not, you will need to formulate a broad research question that interests you and that is amenable to analysis with the existing data sets I will make available this semester.
The research question should revolve around a “central concept” of interest that can be analyzed with the secondary datasets (these will be discussed in class). Topics selected in earlier courses can be modified as necessary given the data available for the exploration of this topic.
Note: You are conducting secondary data analysis in this class – you are not collecting your own data but using datasets containing survey data collected by another organization.
Let me provide an example of an old topic and how this can be shaped into a research question that can be analyzed with survey data. Suppose you are interested in treatment of or discrimination against believers and advocates of radical political ideology. Since you are using survey data, the best way to convert this topic into a researchable project for this class is to consider what kinds of ATTITUDINAL/OPINION questions are asked in the survey about political radical ideas.
What you will find in most surveys are questions asking people (known as the “respondents”) their ATTITUDES/OPINIONS about various social, economic, political issues and in this case one that pertains to alternative or marginalized or discriminated-against groups. This then becomes the focus of your project that revolves around what I call a CENTRAL CONCEPT – let’s call it “political tolerance”. This is what you want to explain — the variation in political tolerance toward those believing in some alternative or radical political ideology.
Note that you are much less likely to find questions asking about whether one was discriminated against. Most of the questions in the surveys ask questions that tap attitudes/opinions. Thus, you may need to frame your topic of interest into attitudes/opinions about that topic, issue, social problem, etc. of interest.
Suppose you find the following question in the survey: “Would you allow a communist or socialist to speak in your community?” This operationalizes one’s level of acceptance or tolerance toward radical political ideas.
The second component is to consider what individual level factors might explain why a person would be, in the case of this example, more or less likely to be tolerant toward alternative political ideas. You might speculate, in the introduction, that some socio-demographic variables such as age, sex, race, religiosity, education, etc. might predict one’s attitude and opinion on this question. In the literature review, which comes later, you can determine whether previous research has found these factors to be significant.
Most importantly. you want to make sure that you have selected a research question that can be analyzed with the available data. In order to determine if you have concepts, and variables, that can be analyzed with the datasets that we will be using, you will need to do the following:
The draft you submit on should include the following pieces of information:
This requires using the sociological reference material and resources online and in the library. The literature that you consult and review must be academic and scholarly – that is, from social science journal articles. You will need to find at least 5 journal articles on this topic. See the list of common and central social science journals in the Literature Review folder in the Blackboard site.
Do not submit an annotated bibliography or paraphrased/plagiarized sections from abstracts and journal articles.
The literature review should highlight for each article the central conceptual and operational hypotheses, the dependent and independent variables, and the factors that were found to have the greatest impact or exhibit the strongest effects on whatever is being explained or predicted. You are reviewing these articles to determine what factors you might examine and include in your analysis.
You do not need to critique the studies; that is unnecessary.
Examples of a literature review exist in every academic research article you will be consulting. You can use these articles as a model for how you will be organizing not just the literature review but your entire research paper.
You should use the ASA citation style for citations in the body of your paper (“in-text” citations) and the reference page. Information on this citation style can be found at:
For “in-text citations” do not include author first names in the text. Do not include article titles in the text. Do not include the author’s university affiliation in the text. Rather, make reference to last names only and the date (e.g. Smith and Jones 2003) and the page if you are quoting a passage (e.g. Smith and Jones 2003; 45).
Again, you should consult and use the resources in the Literature Review folder in the Blackboard site for further guidance and assistance.
The following are the most common comments I include when evaluating and grading the literature reviews. Use this as a guide on what to do and what not to do.
#1: Integrate/synthesize various studies into a narrative rather than listing as an annotated bibliography or summarizing one article after another.
#2: Create list of all references with citations using proper ASA or established style for the social sciences.
#3: Identify and highlight factors found from other studies that can directly inform your data analysis project.
#4: Need to link literature reviewed more closely with your specific conceptual and empirical model.
#5: Avoid excessive quotation of text from other studies. Summarize and synthesize in your own words.
#6: Work on writing clear, precise, well-written sentences. Read, proof, and revise your prose.
#7: How does the lit review serve as a lead-in to your presentation of hypotheses to be tested with the secondary data you will be using?
Again, consult your research articles in the literature review for how this section of the paper is organized and what it includes.
The draft you submit should include the following pieces of information, presented as text (not a list or a series of subheadings) in sentence and paragraph form roughly in the following order:
The following are the most common comments I include when evaluating and grading the Hypotheses, Data, and Methods section. Use this as a guide on what to do and what not to do.
#1: Include the exact questions asked in the survey and the variable names as they appear in the dataset codebook of all variables you will be analyzing when explaining operationalization of concepts. Also include the response options/categories for nominal/ordinal variables. Do this for each variable separately that you will be using for your data analysis.
#2: State the operational hypotheses explicitly using the specific variable measures in your dataset.
#3: Make explicit reference to the specific dataset you are using and the year the data were collected and variables of interest are found.
#4: Include some explanation for WHY you believe there is a relationship between two variables. What sociological process links one thing to another?
#5: Make explicit reference to the primary statistical method you will be using (e.g. crosstabs).
#6: How will you determine statistical significance?
#7: Work on writing clearly. You should proof, revise, modify, and reword for clarity.
#8: Include reference to conceptual hypotheses before stating operational hypotheses.
#9: Indicate the level of measurement of each variable separately.
#10: Do not review literature in this section. This section should follow logically from the literature review that preceded it.
#11: Compose this section with text, sentences, and paragraphs not with lists or subsections/subheadings that correspond to the items I have indicated in the assignment.
-1st: Report results from the frequency distributions for nominal and ordinal variables. Note the distribution of responses. Report percentages not raw number totals.What is the mode? What does this analysis tell you about your research topic? Report means/medians for interval level variables. Is there anything about the frequency distributions or measures of central tendency worth reporting that bears on the research topic?
– 2nd:Report the results for the bivariate statistical analysis (in most cases crosstabs) designed to test your research hypotheses. When you run the crosstabs, in order to keep the size of the table compact, just ask for COLUMN PERCENTAGES. Make sure you have the independent variable in the COLUMN position. Is the pattern consistent with the hypothesis? Are there any surprises? What specific percentage differences are most relevant for the testing of your hypotheses? Which are most substantively significant?
-3rd: Report the statistical significance (Chi-Square result if using crosstabs) after each crosstabulation? If statistically significant, at what level?
– This section should include tables that display the data and statistical analysis that you are reporting
– TO MOVE TABLES FROM SPSS OUTPUT TO A WORD DOCUMENT:
(1) You can highlight the table (you will see red arrow) and simply copy and paste the table into Word. OR
(2) You can use the “Snipping Tool”. When you have the table in SPSS Output open the snipping tool which can be found on your computer under
ALL Programs — Accessories —-Snipping Tool.
Click on ‘New’ and the output document should go pale and then move mouse to create rectangle around table, then click.
This will cut and place table on a separate page.
Copy the table and then paste into Word document.
This table can be resized like an image to fit on the page or to make room for an additional table but as an image it cannot be edited.
The following are the most common comments I include when evaluating and grading the Data Analysis and Results section. Use this as a guide on what to do and what not to do.
#1 : Include relevant percentages in crosstab tables and in the text that describes the substantive results of the crosstab analysis. (See Powerpoint presentation on crosstabulation for method of analysis and interpretation of results and placement of dependent and independent variables.)
#2: Format tables to fit on single page in easy to read size. Remove extraneous text and information from tables produced by SPSS.
#3: Include the univariate descriptive statistics in SPSS tables that are appropriate for the level of measurement of your variables. Report and comment on anything worth noting or of interest.
#4: In describing the results in the text of the paper emphasize the percentage differences across categories of the independent variable.
#5: Wavy lines underneath text indicate prose that should be revised for clarity and readability.
#6: Need a second hypothesis analyzed, tested, and assessed.
#7: Consider recoding variables with large number of categories/values to produce a more compact condensed crosstab table.
#8: Note both the substantive and statistical significance of the findings.
The final draft of the papers is due when you complete the Final Assessment.
Why Choose Us
Top Quality and Well-Researched Papers
We always make sure that writers follow all your instructions precisely. You can choose your academic level: high school, college/university or professional, and we will assign a writer who has a respective degree.
Professional and Experienced Academic Writers
We have a team of professional writers with experience in academic and business writing. Many are native speakers and able to perform any task for which you need help.
Free Unlimited Revisions
If you think we missed something, send your order for a free revision. You have 10 days to submit the order for review after you have received the final document. You can do this yourself after logging into your personal account or by contacting our support.
Prompt Delivery and 100% Money-Back-Guarantee
All papers are always delivered on time. In case we need more time to master your paper, we may contact you regarding the deadline extension. In case you cannot provide us with more time, a 100% refund is guaranteed.
Original & Confidential
We use several writing tools checks to ensure that all documents you receive are free from plagiarism. Our editors carefully review all quotations in the text. We also promise maximum confidentiality in all of our services.
Customer Support 24/7
Our support agents are available 24 hours a day 7 days a week and committed to providing you with the best customer experience. Get in touch whenever you need any assistance.
No matter what kind of academic paper you need and how urgent you need it, you are welcome to choose your academic level and the type of your paper at an affordable price. We take care of all your paper needs and give a 24/7 customer care support system.
Admission and Business Papers
An admission essay is an essay or other written statement by a candidate, often a potential student enrolling in a college, university, or graduate school. You can be rest assurred that through our service we will write the best admission essay for you.
Editing and Proofreading
Our academic writers and editors make the necessary changes to your paper so that it is polished. We also format your document by correctly quoting the sources and creating reference lists in the formats APA, Harvard, MLA, Chicago / Turabian.
If you think your paper could be improved, you can request a review. In this case, your paper will be checked by the writer or assigned to an editor. You can use this option as many times as you see fit. This is free because we want you to be completely satisfied with the service offered.